SYNOPSIS
Set deep in the south of Italy, Corpo Celeste is the story of 13 year old Marta who is struggling to resettle after ten years growing up in Switzerland. Bright-eyed and restless, she observes the sights, sounds and smells of the city but feels very much an outsider. Marta is about to undergo the rite of confirmation. In the convention of the Catholic Church she takes catechism but confronts the morality of the local Catholic community. A series of subtle moments trace her journey as she connects and conflicts with her mother, sister and the Sunday school teacher Santa. From experiencing her period to making the bold decision to cut her hair, Marta begins to shape her own life for the first time since moving back to Italy.
Set deep in the south of Italy, Corpo Celeste is the story of 13 year old Marta who is struggling to resettle after ten years growing up in Switzerland. Bright-eyed and restless, she observes the sights, sounds and smells of the city but feels very much an outsider. Marta is about to undergo the rite of confirmation. In the convention of the Catholic Church she takes catechism but confronts the morality of the local Catholic community. A series of subtle moments trace her journey as she connects and conflicts with her mother, sister and the Sunday school teacher Santa. From experiencing her period to making a bold decision to cut her hair, Marta begins to shape her own life for the first time since moving back to Italy.
Directed by
ALICE ROHRWACHER
Production
TEMPESTA/CARLO CRESTO-DINA
With
RAI CINEMA
In co-production with
JBA PRODUCTION / AMKA FILMS PRODUCTIONS
Year of production
2011
World Premiere
CANNES 2011
Run time
98'
Website
WWW.CORPOCELESTE.IT
DIRECTOR'S NOTES
Legends and school books spoke of the blue space and celestial bodies as a world above. To the inhabitants of the Earth they tacitly opened the great maps of dreams, theyawoke a confused sense of guilt. We would never have met a celestial body at close quarters! We weren’t worthy enough! Yet we too live on a celestial body in space: once thelabel with the name Planet Earth had been removed, the Earth was also a celestial body, or an object of the world above. We were that world above.
Anna Maria Ortese
The way through the world
One of my first visual impressions of Corpo Celeste came from my reading of these words by Anna Maria Ortese, even though the film has nothing directly to do with her book. Yet thevertiginous image of the Earth suspended in space paved the way in the research I was doing, wandering amongst concrete sanctuaries and churches that looked like hospitals. I hadalready begun to write the screenplay, attending catechism lessons, parish meetings, and reading catechism manuals such as “They Will Be Witnesses” and “Katekismo 2000”. But I stilldidn’t know how things would turn out. Those words suddenly appeared as a signal for me, and it was thus that Marta appeared, an adolescent walking through an unknown city, a younggirl who has to find her own way through the world as opposed to a way beyond the world.
Until then I had made only a few films—a documentary or two and a three-‐minute short—but I was clear on a few points. First of all, I was looking for a story to move towards, a story thatdidn’t belong to me, nothing strictly autobiographical. The church seemed the right place to look for it. I didn’t have a Catholic education but I’m very interested in what is happeningin the church, the place delegated to the administration of souls. Another fundamental point was that the story wasn’t to come to a conclusion, but was to arise from a question and paved a way for further inquiry. And the question was realted to what it means to live in our time.
To achieve this, I needed to establish clear boundiaries, to set the rules of the game. The limits were those of a place, Reggio Calabria; those of a time, the contemporary age; those of aworld, the life of a church in Italy’s periphery. The story of Marta was born from these limits, like a short song.
Marta in Reggio Calabria
Marta has just returned to a place she doesn’t know, but to which she somehow belongs: Reggio Calabria, the city in which she was born. The return to the south has become a verycommon phenomenon in recent years, to the extend that we can define it a sort of “return emigration”. Many families are abandoning the prospect of a better life in the north, wherefactories are closing down and jobs are being lost, preferring to return to the land of their origin, where at least they can be helped and supported by relatives and friends.
Marta doesn’t find the colours and community spirit that populate her childhood memories, but rather an immense suburb in which her sense of abandonment and solitude are amplified.Reggio Calabria is a city in which the arrival of modernity is still a living, talking wound. Spaces that await eternal reconstruction, unfinished houses, huge shopping centres, a great need toshow and show off – all speak of a life that, instead of organizing itself, is in a constant rush to accumulate things and add more and more without getting rid of anything. This isn’t the southof warm sun and sea and bright colours. Marta sees Reggio Calabria in an urban, wintry, inhospitable dimension. As I wandered round the city, I remember feeling that the streets andbuildings were as adolescent as Marta. Here was a baby city made up like an adult woman, a raw young girl already consumed by her own experience.
Under Marta’s house lies a dried up river bed, or fiumara, that she sees as a scar in the belly of the city. It’s here that people dump things they don’t need any more only to be replaced by others. Many similar river beds criss-‐ cross the city, large spaces, almost always dry, that gape open suddenly among the houses. Looking closer, this no man’s land is actually full oflife: rubbish, the remains of things, but also gardens, secret allotments, huts. It’s a place in which nature appears in all its force and contradiction. I saw it as magnetic, ambiguous andconstantly changing. A possible fitting for a girl like Marta. Some children are playing in the river bed far away, almost dots on the horizon. Yet their microscopic actions fascinate Martamore than the ones that dominate her daily foreground. How can she enter this world, how can she choose who to belong to?
The catechism
When they are 13-14 years old, young Catholics have to go through the bureaucratic rite of confirmation: “the definitive confirmation of Christian choices”. This is the moment in which theyhave to confirm the choice their parents made when they baptised them as new-‐born babies. It is the first spiritual stand a young person has to take in life. I was keen to speak about thismoment because it often refers to a choice that depends on very disparate factors such as friendship and kinship, and has little to do with acquired spiritual maturity. The aunts and uncleswho welcome Marta upon her arrival in Reggio Calabria see confirmation not so much as a rite of passage but as an excellent way of making friends, and also of getting a weight off yourback; you’ve got to get confirmed, otherwise you can’t get married!
Marta starts attending the confirmation course. She meets other youngsters like herself and teachers who, with the best of intentions, inundate the students with games, activities andmultiple choice quizzes. Take for an exemple Santa, a kind but inadequate lady, a prey to her own emotions, who performs her religious exercises by the book. The students are told of agood Jesus, whose body is spiritual and holy, the Jesus who smiles down from the classroom wall, fair-haired with blue eyes with lots of children around him. It’s the Jesus who appears inthe chorus of the song “I’m in tune with God/That’s the right frequency”. But Marta feels something of a sacred unrest within herself and it finds no peace in the classroom. It is tied to herage, the alienation of her return and also to her character. She observes everything, but she doesn’t know how to choose or understand.
The priest
During early research on the film, I found myself in Reggio Calabria at election time. There were posters everywhere, loudspeakers, propaganda. It was then that I had the idea for a scenein the film: a priest, a “prime elector”, gathering the signatures of people who pledge to vote for a certain candidate. In exchange the politician, once elected, will “help the neighbourhood alot”. The priest I saw was important, an owner of property, restaurants and old people’s homes. But what struck me was the void I saw round him, his anxiety and his boredom. It seemedlike the right cue to work on the second main character in the film. I went to see this priest and discovered that in the morning he recited the rosary on a treadmill to keep fit. I realized howdifficult it is to keep a spiritual quest alive within an organizational routine, without any direction, lost in a network of relations and hierarchies.
Don Mario has become a priest without a calling, who judges the world exclusively through the order of his caste, but in his solitude he is somehow similar to Marta. He’d like to get away.He imagines one day having a large church to manage, becoming important, maybe, who knows, becoming a bishop. To achieve this, he wants to show he’s good at his job, to help thepolitician who, in turn, will help him, to organize a new, spectacular confirmation, the likes of which has never been seen before, thanks to the arrival of the “figurative crucifix”!
This story really happened and it struck me a lot when I read about it in a newspaper. In a village in southern Italy, the faithful had collected signatures to demand the substitution of crucifixthat was too “modern” with a normal one in which Christ’s body was visible—a figurative crucifix. What confusion! My immediate thought was that here was a great story thatencapsulated the huge desolation of the contemporary church. On the one hand, we see a rather awkward effort to imitate modernity, to appear up to date, to bring more young people tochurch. Hence neon crucifixes, rap hymns, and quizzes with prizes entitled “Who wants to be confirmed?” after the famous TV show. But, at the same time, together with this wave ofmodernity, there’s a call for a return to the old ways and tradition, even though the latter now seems like a ceremony deprived of all meaning. Don Mario who wants to transform the meresubstitution of a crucifix into a “grand event”, expressed the unease, the invention of a tradition totally uprooted from the Word, the “new fashion of the old” that at this moment are shakingItaly like a fever.
The abandoned village
Don Mario has reason to be sure of himself because no one watches him carefully. He is expected to be a good manager of a business of the sacred, using his small power to distributesacraments, lenitive consolations, protections and favours. But Marta’s alienation disturbs him and causes him to make a totally unexpected decision. When he comes across her, lost onthe road, as he is about to set out on a journey, instead of addressing the situation rationally as we would expect him to do, taking her home and delegating the problem to others, hedecides to take her with him. Don Mario and Marta find themselves crossing a part of Calabria together towards the abandoned village of Roghudi. They get to know each other and for amoment become vertiginously close, but then reject each other and separate altogether on the way home.
Roghudi belongs to the constellation of villages inland from Calabria’s Ionian coast that were suddenly abandoned in the building fever and reconstruction racket that lasted from the1950s to the 1970s. There is nothing reassuring about this village, hemmed in between the rocks, neither old nor new, abandoned. But it is here that a solitary old priest reads the Gospel toMarta and opens up a new space of reflection for her. The old man describes Jesus not so much as a gentle, good saint, but as lonely, furious man, closer to the wound of her ownadolescence than the syrupy image that appears in the illustrations of the catechism. Marta decides that it isn’t necessary to go very far, because as Anna Maria Ortese says, the CelestialBody, the world above is already where we are.
Alice Rohrwacher, February 2011
BIO
Alice Rohrwacher was born in 1981 in Fiesole (Italy) and studied in Turin and Lisbon.
She has worked in music as performing musician for theatre and in documentary filmmaking as editor and director.
Filmography
LE MERAVIGLIE / THE WONDERS Italy 2014 (111’)
- “Grand Jury Prize” Cannes Festival 2014
- “Best film” Filmfest München 2014
- “Black Pearl Award” New Horizons Abu Dhabi Film festival 2014
- “Special Jury Award” Seville European film Festival 2014
- “Best Screenplay” Mar del Plata International Film Festival 2014
CORPO CELESTE Italy/France/Switzerland/Germany 2011 (98’)
- “Ingmar Bergman Int. Debut Award” 2012
- “Nastro d’Argento” Best Newcomer 2012
- “Ciak d’Oro” Best Newcomer 2012
- “Premio Suso Cecchi D’Amico” Best Screenplay 2012
LA FIUMARA episode of the collective documentary “What is Italy missing” Italia 2006 (7’)
Video
CAST
Marta YLE VIANELLO
Don Mario SALVATORE CANTALUPO
Santa PASQUALINA SCUNCIA
Rita ANITA CAPRIOLI
don Lorenzo RENATO CARPENTIERI
and with
Monia Alfieri / Licia Amodeo / Maria Luisa De Crescenzo / Gianni Federico /Marcello Fonte / Carmelo Giordano / Paola Lavini / Anna Scaglione /Angelo Tronchese / Maria Trunfio
Crew
written and directed by Alice Rohrwacher
produced by tempesta / Carlo Cresto-Dina with Rai Cinema
produced by Jacques Bidou, Marianne Dumoulin and Tiziana Soudani
a Tempesta / JBA Production / AMKA Films Productions production
in co-production with Arte France Cinéma / RSI Radiotelevisione svizzera / SRG SSRidée suisse
with the collaboration of Arte France and Cineteca di Bologna with the contribution of the Calabria Film Commission-‐Regione Calabria
Director of Photography Hélène Louvart
Editor Marco Spoletini
Sound Editors Daniela Bassani and Marzia Cordò
Production Manager Giorgio Gasparini
Set Designer Luca Servino
Costumes Loredana Buscemi
INTERNATIONAL SALES
USA
UK
Switzerland
France
Portugal
Festival
New York Film Festival
Sundance Film Festival
Rio Film Festival
London Film Festival
Dubai Film Festival